Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #18723 > unrolled thread

Re: classes and __iter__

Started byChris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com>
First post2012-01-09 16:15 -0800
Last post2012-01-09 16:15 -0800
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: classes and __iter__ Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2012-01-09 16:15 -0800

#18723 — Re: classes and __iter__

FromChris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com>
Date2012-01-09 16:15 -0800
SubjectRe: classes and __iter__
Message-ID<mailman.4562.1326154520.27778.python-list@python.org>
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:30 PM, david.garvey@gmail.com
<david.garvey@gmail.com> wrote:
> Chris,
>
> Both a list and dict are both iterable.  I get a python dictionary object of
> both iterables.;)

No, you get a Python object with both iterables as instance variables.
Instance variables happen to be stored using a dict (which is
accessible as .__dict__), but that's to some extent an implementation
detail whose relevance here I fail to see. My point was that, as Ian
explained, your __iter__() method, as written, is horribly broken.

> It is nice... but I don't know if this is good form?

I'm confused as to why you wrote a class (particularly when its name
is an *action* rather than a noun; big red flag right there!) for your
task in the first place. I think you'd be best served by moving your
parsing code into a function and using a
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/sorteddict , which provides the
sorted-keys property you seemed to be trying to accomplish.

Also, please avoid top-posting in the future. (See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style )

Cheers,
Chris
--
http://rebertia.com

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web