Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #18551 > unrolled thread

Re: Typed python comparison / code analysis questions

Started byMRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com>
First post2012-01-05 16:10 +0000
Last post2012-01-05 16:10 +0000
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Typed python comparison / code analysis questions MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-01-05 16:10 +0000

#18551 — Re: Typed python comparison / code analysis questions

FromMRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com>
Date2012-01-05 16:10 +0000
SubjectRe: Typed python comparison / code analysis questions
Message-ID<mailman.4454.1325780017.27778.python-list@python.org>
On 05/01/2012 06:37, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 1/4/2012 3:42 PM, Lucas Vickers wrote:
>>  At the moment python3 isn't an option.  There's a variety of
>>  dependencies I'm working around.
>
> Please consider telling the authors of libraries you need that you would
> like a Python 3 version and say why. One reason given for not upgrading
> packages is 'lack of demand'.
>
I could also add that if you find a bug in a library, report it.

As an example, some months ago I read on StackOverflow an old answer
where someone mentioned trying the "regex" module but had found that
some Unicode properties were unreliable. That came as a surprise to me
because no-one had reported such a problem (and I still don't know what
that problem was).

Compare that with a recent bug report that it didn't work correctly on
Mac OS X. The reporter was very helpful and that bug is now fixed.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web