Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #18323 > unrolled thread

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

Started byPeter Otten <__peter__@web.de>
First post2012-01-02 13:20 +0100
Last post2012-01-02 19:10 -0500
Articles 5 on this page of 25 — 12 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-01-02 13:20 +0100
    Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-01-03 06:45 +1100
      Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2012-01-02 15:56 -0500
        Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-01-03 08:59 +1100
          Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-01-03 08:21 +0000
            Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-01-04 08:57 +1100
              Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-01-04 01:37 +0000
                Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-01-04 12:54 +1100
                  Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-01-04 02:04 +0000
                    Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-01-04 13:42 +1100
                      Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2012-01-03 19:34 -0800
                      Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Rami Chowdhury <rami.chowdhury@gmail.com> - 2012-01-04 12:49 +0000
                      Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-01-04 11:39 -0700
                      Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-01-04 12:28 -0700
                      Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-01-04 13:08 -0700
                      Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Arnaud Delobelle <arnodel@gmail.com> - 2012-01-04 20:51 +0000
                      Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2012-01-05 21:26 -0800
                  Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-01-04 13:37 +1100
                    Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2012-01-05 21:22 -0800
                  Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Dan Sommers <dan@tombstonezero.net> - 2012-01-04 03:06 +0000
                  Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-01-04 14:31 +1100
          Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-01-03 09:47 +0100
            Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-01-04 09:11 +1100
      Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2012-01-02 22:43 +0000
      Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2012-01-02 19:10 -0500

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#18486

FromChris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Date2012-01-04 14:31 +1100
Message-ID<mailman.4399.1325647914.27778.python-list@python.org>
In reply to#18477
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Dan Sommers <dan@tombstonezero.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:37:24 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> And "import pickle" objectifies pickles ...
>
> Not quite:  "import pickle" merely readies the machinery that objectifies
> pickles.  In order to objectify a pickle, you have to call pickle.loads:

Modules are objects too!!!

*marches around carrying signs proclaiming Rights for Modules*

Does anybody else feel that this holy war is somewhat pointless? Oh
wait. Holy war. "Pointless" is redundant.

ChrisA

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#18387

FromPeter Otten <__peter__@web.de>
Date2012-01-03 09:47 +0100
Message-ID<mailman.4340.1325580429.27778.python-list@python.org>
In reply to#18351
Ben Finney wrote:

> The next time someone asks why the ratio of women becoming programmers
> is disproportionately low, please recall episodes where men here give
> defenses of jokes that objectify women.

What's that? The butterfly effect of diversity?

If you want more women in IT go to a local school and show the girls things 
they can do with a computer that they find fun and interesting. If you have 
a daughter try more Lego and less Barbies. 

Don't insist if it doesn't work out. Your ideas may not be in alignment with 
the pursuit of happiness...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#18457

FromBen Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au>
Date2012-01-04 09:11 +1100
Message-ID<871urg1lof.fsf@benfinney.id.au>
In reply to#18387
Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> writes:

> If you want more women in IT go to a local school and show the girls
> things they can do with a computer that they find fun and interesting.
> If you have a daughter try more Lego and less Barbies.

I have no objection to doing those things *as well as* rejecting sexist
jokes in our community.

-- 
 \         “Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself. The first |
  `\     principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the |
_o__)               easiest person to fool.” —Richard P. Feynman, 1964 |
Ben Finney

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#18352

FromRobert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com>
Date2012-01-02 22:43 +0000
Message-ID<mailman.4320.1325544257.27778.python-list@python.org>
In reply to#18344
On 1/2/12 8:56 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:

> But, hey, inertia. As long as we're trying to make this dude get rid
> of the offensive part, might as well get rid of the rest too. Why not
> make him get rid of everything he's written, too?

Because that's something that no one desires, nor is it the logical conclusion 
of anything that anyone has expressed here. Please don't invent strawmen.

-- 
Robert Kern

"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
  that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
  an underlying truth."
   -- Umberto Eco

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#18357

FromDevin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com>
Date2012-01-02 19:10 -0500
Message-ID<mailman.4325.1325549468.27778.python-list@python.org>
In reply to#18344
> Because that's something that no one desires, nor is it the logical
> conclusion of anything that anyone has expressed here. Please don't invent
> strawmen.

You're right, sorry. I let myself say something dumb. I'll try not to
do it again.

-- Devin

On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/2/12 8:56 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
>
>> But, hey, inertia. As long as we're trying to make this dude get rid
>> of the offensive part, might as well get rid of the rest too. Why not
>> make him get rid of everything he's written, too?
>
>
> Because that's something that no one desires, nor is it the logical
> conclusion of anything that anyone has expressed here. Please don't invent
> strawmen.
>
>
> --
> Robert Kern
>
> "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
>  that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it
> had
>  an underlying truth."
>  -- Umberto Eco
>
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web