Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #49957 > unrolled thread

Re: Coping with cyclic imports

Started byOscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com>
First post2013-07-05 10:36 +0100
Last post2013-07-05 10:36 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Coping with cyclic imports Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-07-05 10:36 +0100

#49957 — Re: Coping with cyclic imports

FromOscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com>
Date2013-07-05 10:36 +0100
SubjectRe: Coping with cyclic imports
Message-ID<mailman.4286.1373017007.3114.python-list@python.org>
On 5 July 2013 02:24, Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> wrote:
> On 04Jul2013 16:03, Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> wrote:
> |
> | Is there some reason you're responding to a post from 5 years ago?
>
> Is there some reason not to, if no newer solutions are available?

No, I was genuinely curious. My way of accessing this
forum/newsgroup/mailing list doesn't give me a way to respond to very
old posts but others seem to do it every now and again. I see now that
if you're looking at an old thread in Google Groups (rather than e.g.
the python.org archives) it makes the thread seem more like a forum
than a newsgroup or a mailing list so that it's easy and seems more
natural to respond to old posts.


Oscar

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web