Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #8459 > unrolled thread
| Started by | rzed <rzantow@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-06-26 13:04 +0000 |
| Last post | 2011-06-26 16:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 9 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
Python 3 syntax error question rzed <rzantow@gmail.com> - 2011-06-26 13:04 +0000
Re: Python 3 syntax error question steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info - 2011-06-27 00:51 +1000
Re: Python 3 syntax error question rzed <rzantow@gmail.com> - 2011-06-26 15:28 +0000
Re: Python 3 syntax error question Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-06-27 01:31 +1000
Re: Python 3 syntax error question Noah Hall <enalicho@gmail.com> - 2011-06-26 16:32 +0100
Re: Python 3 syntax error question Jerry Hill <malaclypse2@gmail.com> - 2011-06-26 12:50 -0400
Re: Python 3 syntax error question Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-06-26 13:31 -0400
Re: Python 3 syntax error question Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2011-06-26 16:59 +0200
Re: Python 3 syntax error question Noah Hall <enalicho@gmail.com> - 2011-06-26 16:10 +0100
| From | rzed <rzantow@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-26 13:04 +0000 |
| Subject | Python 3 syntax error question |
| Message-ID | <Xns9F105B30356CArzantowgmailcom@74.209.131.13> |
I've tried to install PySVG in a Python 3 setting, and I get a few
errors on the build. Most are easy to fix, but this one I can't
explain or fix:
<error>
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "builders.py", line 12, in <module>
from pysvg.shape import *
File "C:\Python32\lib\site-packages\pysvg\shape.py", line 91
def moveToPoint(self,(x,y)):
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
</error>
The moveToPoint method occurs three times in the file, with identical
signatures. The other two are not showing up as errors, though since
they occur later in the file, that may not be indicative.
I don't see anything erroneous in this line. The syntax error often
comes from the previous line, but I've moved this method around and
it has always failed on this line and no other, regardless of what
went before.
I'm new to Py3, so maybe there's some obvious thing I'm not seeing
here. Does anyone have any suggestions?
--
rzed
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-27 00:51 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <4e074768$0$29982$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #8459 |
rzed wrote:
> I've tried to install PySVG in a Python 3 setting, and I get a few
> errors on the build. Most are easy to fix, but this one I can't
> explain or fix:
>
> <error>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
> File "builders.py", line 12, in <module>
> from pysvg.shape import *
> File "C:\Python32\lib\site-packages\pysvg\shape.py", line 91
> def moveToPoint(self,(x,y)):
> ^
> SyntaxError: invalid syntax
> </error>
Function signatures with automatic tuple-unpacking are no longer allowed in
Python3. So functions or methods like this:
def moveToPoint(self,(x,y)):
have to be re-written with the tuple unpacking moved into the body of the
function, e.g. something like this:
def moveToPoint(self, x_y):
x, y = x_y
Are you aware that you're trying to install a Python2 library under Python3?
--
Steven
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rzed <rzantow@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-26 15:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <Xns9F1073B21B96Frzantowgmailcom@74.209.131.13> |
| In reply to | #8461 |
steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info wrote in news:4e074768$0$29982$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com: > rzed wrote: > >> I've tried to install PySVG in a Python 3 setting, and I get a >> few errors on the build. Most are easy to fix, but this one I >> can't explain or fix: >> >> <error> >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> >> File "builders.py", line 12, in <module> >> from pysvg.shape import * >> File "C:\Python32\lib\site-packages\pysvg\shape.py", line 91 >> def moveToPoint(self,(x,y)): >> ^ >> SyntaxError: invalid syntax >> </error> > > Function signatures with automatic tuple-unpacking are no longer > allowed in Python3. So functions or methods like this: > > def moveToPoint(self,(x,y)): > > have to be re-written with the tuple unpacking moved into the > body of the function, e.g. something like this: > > def moveToPoint(self, x_y): > x, y = x_y > > > Are you aware that you're trying to install a Python2 library > under Python3? > > Thank you all for your responses. Yes, I am aware of the version difference, but not of all the implications of that. I will run this through 2to3, but even without doing that, there are only about four syntax errors, and the others were obvious and easily corrected. There does not seem to be a Py3 version of this package. I was hoping to try it to see what broke. Well, I found out at least part of that, didn't I? I was not aware of the removal of tuple-unpacking. I expect there was some extensive conversation about that. As to 2to3, I have to say that: -def a(b, (c,d)): +def a(b, xxx_todo_changeme): + (c,d) = xxx_todo_changeme ... is not terribly revealing if one is unaware of what about it needs changing. I know, I know: RTFM.... -- rzed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-27 01:31 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.417.1309102349.1164.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #8464 |
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:28 AM, rzed <rzantow@gmail.com> wrote: > As to 2to3, I have to say that: > > -def a(b, (c,d)): > +def a(b, xxx_todo_changeme): > + (c,d) = xxx_todo_changeme > > ... is not terribly revealing if one is unaware of what about it > needs changing. I know, I know: RTFM.... Sure, but you don't _have_ to look at the diff. Just run it through 2to3 and see how it runs. Never know, it might work direct out of the box! ChrisA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Noah Hall <enalicho@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-26 16:32 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.418.1309102375.1164.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #8464 |
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:28 PM, rzed <rzantow@gmail.com> wrote: > steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info wrote in > news:4e074768$0$29982$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com: > >> rzed wrote: >> >>> I've tried to install PySVG in a Python 3 setting, and I get a >>> few errors on the build. Most are easy to fix, but this one I >>> can't explain or fix: >>> >>> <error> >>> Traceback (most recent call last): >>> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> >>> File "builders.py", line 12, in <module> >>> from pysvg.shape import * >>> File "C:\Python32\lib\site-packages\pysvg\shape.py", line 91 >>> def moveToPoint(self,(x,y)): >>> ^ >>> SyntaxError: invalid syntax >>> </error> >> >> Function signatures with automatic tuple-unpacking are no longer >> allowed in Python3. So functions or methods like this: >> >> def moveToPoint(self,(x,y)): >> >> have to be re-written with the tuple unpacking moved into the >> body of the function, e.g. something like this: >> >> def moveToPoint(self, x_y): >> x, y = x_y >> >> >> Are you aware that you're trying to install a Python2 library >> under Python3? >> >> > > Thank you all for your responses. Yes, I am aware of the version > difference, but not of all the implications of that. I will run this > through 2to3, but even without doing that, there are only about four > syntax errors, and the others were obvious and easily corrected. > > There does not seem to be a Py3 version of this package. I was hoping > to try it to see what broke. Well, I found out at least part of that, > didn't I? > > I was not aware of the removal of tuple-unpacking. I expect there was > some extensive conversation about that. > > As to 2to3, I have to say that: > > -def a(b, (c,d)): > +def a(b, xxx_todo_changeme): > + (c,d) = xxx_todo_changeme > > ... is not terribly revealing if one is unaware of what about it > needs changing. I know, I know: RTFM.... It means delete every line with a '-' and replace them with those next to the '+' Of course, if you read the doc, it'll give you lots of different options, including writing to the file, so all you need to do is change the variable names.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jerry Hill <malaclypse2@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-26 12:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.419.1309107054.1164.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #8464 |
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure, but you don't _have_ to look at the diff. Just run it through > 2to3 and see how it runs. Never know, it might work direct out of the > box! This has been my experience, by the way. I've used a few small pure python libraries written for python 2.x that don't have 3.x versions, and they've all worked just fine with just a quick run through the 2to3 process. I can't speak for larger libraries, or ones with lots of compiled code, but my experience with 2to3 has been great. -- Jerry
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-26 13:31 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.421.1309109519.1164.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #8464 |
On 6/26/2011 11:28 AM, rzed wrote: > steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info wrote in >> Are you aware that you're trying to install a Python2 library >> under Python3? > Thank you all for your responses. Yes, I am aware of the version > difference, but not of all the implications of that. I will run this > through 2to3, but even without doing that, there are only about four > syntax errors, and the others were obvious and easily corrected. When you are done, I hope you feed results back to author as to how to make code run under Py3 without change (the explicit unpacking needed for Py3 works in Py2 also) or without further change after 2to3. Then encourage author to advertise fact and add Py3 classifier if listed in PyPI. -- Terry Jan Reedy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-26 16:59 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.415.1309100401.1164.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #8459 |
rzed wrote: > I've tried to install PySVG in a Python 3 setting, and I get a few > errors on the build. Most are easy to fix, but this one I can't > explain or fix: > > <error> > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> > File "builders.py", line 12, in <module> > from pysvg.shape import * > File "C:\Python32\lib\site-packages\pysvg\shape.py", line 91 > def moveToPoint(self,(x,y)): > ^ > SyntaxError: invalid syntax > </error> > > The moveToPoint method occurs three times in the file, with identical > signatures. The other two are not showing up as errors, though since > they occur later in the file, that may not be indicative. > > I don't see anything erroneous in this line. The syntax error often > comes from the previous line, but I've moved this method around and > it has always failed on this line and no other, regardless of what > went before. > > I'm new to Py3, so maybe there's some obvious thing I'm not seeing > here. Does anyone have any suggestions? > Quoting http://docs.python.org/dev/py3k/whatsnew/3.0.html#removed-syntax """ You can no longer write def foo(a, (b, c)): .... Use def foo(a, b_c): b, c = b_c instead. """ If there isn't a Python 3 version of PySVG you can try to run it through http://docs.python.org/dev/py3k/library/2to3.html#to3-reference to make the easy changes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Noah Hall <enalicho@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-26 16:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.416.1309101045.1164.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #8459 |
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 2:04 PM, rzed <rzantow@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've tried to install PySVG in a Python 3 setting, and I get a few
> errors on the build. Most are easy to fix, but this one I can't
> explain or fix:
>
> <error>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
> File "builders.py", line 12, in <module>
> from pysvg.shape import *
> File "C:\Python32\lib\site-packages\pysvg\shape.py", line 91
> def moveToPoint(self,(x,y)):
> ^
> SyntaxError: invalid syntax
> </error>
>
> The moveToPoint method occurs three times in the file, with identical
> signatures. The other two are not showing up as errors, though since
> they occur later in the file, that may not be indicative.
>
> I don't see anything erroneous in this line. The syntax error often
> comes from the previous line, but I've moved this method around and
> it has always failed on this line and no other, regardless of what
> went before.
>
> I'm new to Py3, so maybe there's some obvious thing I'm not seeing
> here. Does anyone have any suggestions?
Did you run it through 2to3? When I run
def a(b, (c,d)):
pass
through 2to3, it tells me what I need to change.
-def a(b, (c,d)):
+def a(b, xxx_todo_changeme):
+ (c,d) = xxx_todo_changeme
(which is what Steven said)
If you haven't used 2to3, I suggest you use it.
HTH.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web