Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #49605 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-07-02 06:37 +0300 |
| Last post | 2013-07-03 15:18 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 on this page of 41 — 19 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
OSError [Errno 26] ?!?! Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> - 2013-07-02 06:37 +0300
Re: OSError [Errno 26] ?!?! Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2013-07-02 15:15 +1000
Re: OSError [Errno 26] ?!?! Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> - 2013-07-02 08:57 +0300
Re: OSError [Errno 26] ?!?! Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2013-07-02 17:21 +1000
Re: OSError [Errno 26] ?!?! Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> - 2013-07-02 12:40 +0300
Re: OSError [Errno 26] ?!?! Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick <kwpolska@gmail.com> - 2013-07-02 12:06 +0200
Re: OSError [Errno 26] ?!?! Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-07-02 08:00 -0400
Re: OSError [Errno 26] ?!?! Νίκος <nikos@superhost.gr> - 2013-07-02 15:39 +0300
Re: OSError [Errno 26] ?!?! Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick <kwpolska@gmail.com> - 2013-07-02 15:00 +0200
Re: OSError [Errno 26] ?!?! Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2013-07-02 14:58 +0100
Re: OSError [Errno 26] ?!?! Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-07-03 00:19 +0000
Re: Persistence of CGI (was: OSError [Errno 26] ?!?!) Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-07-02 19:57 -0500
Python list code of conduct Steve Simmons <square.steve@gmail.com> - 2013-07-02 16:51 +0100
Re: Python list code of conduct Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-07-03 00:42 +0000
Re: Python list code of conduct Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-07-02 20:48 +0100
Re: Python list code of conduct Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2013-07-02 15:33 -0500
Re: Python list code of conduct Ned Deily <nad@acm.org> - 2013-07-02 13:52 -0700
Re: Python list code of conduct Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-07-02 19:46 -0400
Re: Python list code of conduct Ned Deily <nad@acm.org> - 2013-07-02 17:07 -0700
Re: Python list code of conduct Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2013-07-03 10:10 +1000
Bug reports [was Re: Python list code of conduct] Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-07-03 00:52 +0000
Re: Bug reports [was Re: Python list code of conduct] Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-07-03 02:12 +0100
Re: Bug reports [was Re: Python list code of conduct] Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-07-03 18:02 +1000
Re: Bug reports [was Re: Python list code of conduct] Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-07-03 10:03 -0400
Re: Bug reports [was Re: Python list code of conduct] Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-07-04 00:15 +1000
Re: Bug reports [was Re: Python list code of conduct] Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-07-03 10:23 -0400
Re: Bug reports [was Re: Python list code of conduct] Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-07-04 00:52 +1000
Re: Bug reports [was Re: Python list code of conduct] Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-07-03 20:11 +0000
Re: Bug reports [was Re: Python list code of conduct] Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-07-03 16:31 -0400
Re: Bug reports [was Re: Python list code of conduct] Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-07-03 21:52 +0000
IPv6 deployment by ISPs (was: Bug reports) Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-07-04 11:15 +1000
Re: Python list code of conduct Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-07-03 02:18 -0400
Re: Python list code of conduct Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-07-03 10:10 -0400
Re: Python list code of conduct Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-07-03 17:24 +0000
Re: Python list code of conduct Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-07-03 08:39 +1000
Re: Python list code of conduct Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-07-03 06:18 +0000
Re: Python list code of conduct Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-07-02 19:15 -0400
Re: Python list code of conduct Neil Hodgson <nhodgson@iinet.net.au> - 2013-07-03 19:50 +1000
Re: Python list code of conduct Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-07-03 10:39 +1000
Re: Python list code of conduct rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-07-03 04:50 -0700
Re: Python list code of conduct Steve Simmons <square.steve@gmail.com> - 2013-07-03 15:18 +0100
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
| From | Steve Simmons <square.steve@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-07-03 15:18 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Python list code of conduct |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4171.1372861458.3114.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #49720 |
On 03/07/2013 12:50, rusi wrote: > On Wednesday, July 3, 2013 6:09:35 AM UTC+5:30, Ben Finney wrote: >> Dennis Lee Bieber writes: >> >>> So who would enforce any rules? >> Ideally, this community is healthy enough for us to enforce the code of >> conduct of our host, through social convention among us all. > Thanks Ben for that. > Lets not stymie Steve Simmons original suggestion for a CoC by making it into a formal CoC and then saying its impossible. > > There is a good deal of informal enforcement already. Consider eg: > - Mark's footnote reminding about GG problems and their solutions <link> > - Steven's brusque 'cut-the-crap' type responses > - Your own prompt STOPs to racist/sexist etc posts > etc > > So we may take and welcome Steve Simmons' call to expand that list. > I certainly welcome the suggestion. Thanks Rusi - and everyone else that provided feedback. I understand (and had already anticipated) that this type of group can't and probably shouldn't be moderated in the more draconian sense of the word but there's no reason why we couldn't create some behavioural and technical guidelines. I had it in mind to move to a few (?!) paragraphs that read well when considered as a single document but that were also suitable to cut'n'paste into a response - much as Mark puts his GG warning in every mail. The aim would be to put a considered response in a first reply that tells the OP 'this is what you need to do to get a sensible answer'. We have this for GG & code fragments and I see no reason why we can't have it for bad language; bad attitude; unreasonable expectations; thread high-jacking; top posting; and all the other sins we expect Noobs (and some long standing members!) to avoid. I guess I should have said this up front but let me say it now: I completely 'get' that this won't fix the Trolls or the dyed-in-the-wool pedants or recidivist high-jackers but it may put some buffering between: Newb: "I want you to do my homework and I have to give it in tomorrow morning" and Pythonista: "you're a dick" If there's enough support for the general idea, I'm happy to make a decent sized contribution but if there isn't - Nuff said. Steve
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web