Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #52269 > unrolled thread
| Started by | MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-08-09 20:44 +0100 |
| Last post | 2013-08-09 20:44 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Python3 Multiprocessing MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2013-08-09 20:44 +0100
| From | MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-08-09 20:44 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Python3 Multiprocessing |
| Message-ID | <mailman.406.1376077484.1251.python-list@python.org> |
On 09/08/2013 20:30, Devyn Collier Johnson wrote: > Aloha! > > I need a command that will make threads created by > "multiprocessing.Process()" wait for each other to complete. For > instance, I want to do something like this: > > job1 = multiprocessing.Process(CMD1()) > job2 = multiprocessing.Process(CMD2()) > > jobs1.start(); jobs2.start() > > PY_FUNC() > > The command "PY_FUNC()" depends on the end result of the actions of > CMD1() and CMD2(). I need some kind of wait command for the two threads > that will not let the script continue until job1 and job2 are complete. > Is this possible in Python3? > Possibly you mean .join: jobs1.start() jobs2.start() jobs1.join() jobs2.join()
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web