Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #17783 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-12-23 02:46 -0600 |
| Last post | 2011-12-23 02:46 -0600 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: IPC with multiprocessing.connection Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2011-12-23 02:46 -0600
| From | Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-12-23 02:46 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: IPC with multiprocessing.connection |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4022.1324630036.27778.python-list@python.org> |
On 12/23/2011 2:32 AM, Deepak Babu wrote: > See if http://www.rsdcbabu.com/2011/02/multiprocessing-with-python.htmlhelps > you. It doesn't. There is not even a mention of the connection submodule (plus it's Python 2, and I'm familiar enough with Python 2 to do a good job of porting to py3k). I don't even want to spawn new processes with the multiprocessing module; I want processes which may not even be written in Python to communicate over a named pipe or Unix domain socket. -- CPython 3.2.2 | Windows NT 6.1.7601.17640
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web