Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #17783 > unrolled thread

Re: IPC with multiprocessing.connection

Started byAndrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com>
First post2011-12-23 02:46 -0600
Last post2011-12-23 02:46 -0600
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: IPC with multiprocessing.connection Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2011-12-23 02:46 -0600

#17783 — Re: IPC with multiprocessing.connection

FromAndrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com>
Date2011-12-23 02:46 -0600
SubjectRe: IPC with multiprocessing.connection
Message-ID<mailman.4022.1324630036.27778.python-list@python.org>
On 12/23/2011 2:32 AM, Deepak Babu wrote:
> See if http://www.rsdcbabu.com/2011/02/multiprocessing-with-python.htmlhelps
> you.
It doesn't. There is not even a mention of the connection submodule 
(plus it's Python 2, and I'm familiar enough with Python 2 to do a good 
job of porting to py3k). I don't even want to spawn new processes with 
the multiprocessing module; I want processes which may not even be 
written in Python to communicate over a named pipe or Unix domain socket.

-- 
CPython 3.2.2 | Windows NT 6.1.7601.17640

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web