Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #101521 > unrolled thread

Re: I'm missing something here...

Started byCameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>
First post2016-01-12 18:13 +1100
Last post2016-01-12 18:13 +1100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: I'm missing something here... Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2016-01-12 18:13 +1100

#101521 — Re: I'm missing something here...

FromCameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>
Date2016-01-12 18:13 +1100
SubjectRe: I'm missing something here...
Message-ID<mailman.40.1452582812.13488.python-list@python.org>
On 11Jan2016 23:55, Erik <python@lucidity.plus.com> wrote:
>On 11/01/16 23:26, Skip Montanaro wrote:
>>If I change the last line of find_problems to call
>>prob_dates.update(), the message disappears. Why is pylint (1.4.2 BTW)
>>complaining that the prob_dates argument of find_problems is unused
>>when I use the |= operator?
>
>Is it complaining about that, or is it because the 'for' loop body might be 
>executed zero times?

The former. Almost any loop _might_ be executed zero times. Compilers and 
linters etc should only complain if they can prove the loop is always executed 
zero times.

Cheers,
Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web