Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #98026 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-01 12:59 +1100 |
| Last post | 2015-11-01 12:59 +1100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: UNABLE TO GET IDLE TO RUN Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 12:59 +1100
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-01 12:59 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: UNABLE TO GET IDLE TO RUN |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4.1446343201.4463.python-list@python.org> |
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Michiel Overtoom <motoom@xs4all.nl> wrote: > I'd go even a step further. I think IDLE should not only warn, but completely prevent saving a file which shadows a stdlib module, which will effectively render Python unusable. I remember from a few weeks back, a teacher with the same problem posted this on the mailinglist. Eventually she had a technician coming in to reinstall Windows, just to fix this problem ;-) What an overkill... > Trouble is, that applies only if Idle was the thing that saved it under that name and in that location. And that still only prevents access to one module (imagine, for instance, shadowing wave.py - how many programs will really break?). Not sure it should *prevent* anything like that. A warning, sure, but not an absolute error. ChrisA
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web