Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #107422 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-20 15:53 -0400 |
| Last post | 2016-04-20 15:53 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: PEP proposal: sequence expansion support for yield statement: yield * Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-04-20 15:53 -0400
| From | Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-20 15:53 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: PEP proposal: sequence expansion support for yield statement: yield * |
| Message-ID | <mailman.37.1461182027.12923.python-list@python.org> |
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016, at 15:34, Ken Seehart wrote: > Currently the common pattern for yielding the elements in a sequence is > as follows: > > for x in sequence: yield x > > I propose the following replacement (the result would be identical): > > yield *sequence yield from sequence
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web