Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #103752 > unrolled thread

Re: common mistakes in this simple program

Started byChris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
First post2016-03-01 05:34 +1100
Last post2016-03-01 05:34 +1100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: common mistakes in this simple program Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 05:34 +1100

#103752 — Re: common mistakes in this simple program

FromChris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-01 05:34 +1100
SubjectRe: common mistakes in this simple program
Message-ID<mailman.37.1456770890.20602.python-list@python.org>
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Ganesh Pal <ganesh1pal@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> In my case the exception is nothing but the error  example if  we plan
> to run the command  say  #ifconfig -a and the command fails because of
> a type ( say u ran #igconfig -a).
>
> we will the output as
>
> # Failed to run igconfig -a got Error (ret=127)
> out :
> error: command not found: igconfig
>
> So the execption is the error i.e Error (ret=127) out : error: command
> not found: igconfig,  Iam fine with this behaviour.
>

You're falling into the trap of assuming that the only exception you
can ever get is the one that you're planning for, and then handling
ALL exceptions as though they were that one. Instead catch ONLY the
exception that you're expecting to see, and ignore everything else. Do
not use a bare "except:" clause, nor even "except Exception:", for
this. You will appreciate it later on.

ChrisA

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web