Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #33249 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-11-13 17:18 +0100 |
| Last post | 2012-11-13 17:18 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Passing functions as parameter (multiprocessing) Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-11-13 17:18 +0100
| From | Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-11-13 17:18 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Passing functions as parameter (multiprocessing) |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3632.1352823489.27098.python-list@python.org> |
Oscar Benjamin wrote: > I don't know if this is to do with the way that the code was > simplified before posting but this subproc function wrapper does > nothing (even after Peter fixed it below). This code is needlessly > complicated for what it does. Jean-Michel's Post had the following comment preceding his subproc() definition >>> # here it should be decorated, but for this example to be kept >>> simple, the function is only wrapped, doing nothing special which I unhelpfully removed...
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web