Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #33249 > unrolled thread

Re: Passing functions as parameter (multiprocessing)

Started byPeter Otten <__peter__@web.de>
First post2012-11-13 17:18 +0100
Last post2012-11-13 17:18 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Passing functions as parameter (multiprocessing) Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-11-13 17:18 +0100

#33249 — Re: Passing functions as parameter (multiprocessing)

FromPeter Otten <__peter__@web.de>
Date2012-11-13 17:18 +0100
SubjectRe: Passing functions as parameter (multiprocessing)
Message-ID<mailman.3632.1352823489.27098.python-list@python.org>
Oscar Benjamin wrote:

> I don't know if this is to do with the way that the code was
> simplified before posting but this subproc function wrapper does
> nothing (even after Peter fixed it below). This code is needlessly
> complicated for what it does.

Jean-Michel's Post had the following comment preceding his subproc() 
definition

>>>    # here it should be decorated, but for this example to be kept
>>>     simple, the function is only wrapped, doing nothing special

which I unhelpfully removed...

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web