Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #92429 > unrolled thread

Re: Did the 3.4.4 docs get published early?

Started byTerry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
First post2015-06-10 19:16 -0400
Last post2015-06-10 19:16 -0400
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Did the 3.4.4 docs get published early? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-06-10 19:16 -0400

#92429 — Re: Did the 3.4.4 docs get published early?

FromTerry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Date2015-06-10 19:16 -0400
SubjectRe: Did the 3.4.4 docs get published early?
Message-ID<mailman.363.1433978233.13271.python-list@python.org>
On 6/10/2015 10:11 AM, Nicholas Chammas wrote:
> For example, here is a "New in version 3.4.4" method:
>
> https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio-task.html#asyncio.ensure_future
>
> However, the latest release appears to be 3.4.3:
>
> https://www.python.org/downloads/
>
> Is this normal, or did the 3.4.4 docs somehow get published early by
> mistake?

The online x.y docs reflect the x.y branch in the repository.  New 
features are not normally added in an x.y.z maintenance release, which 
is normally bugfixes only.  However, asyncio is a new module in 3.4 and 
marked as 'provisional', which means subject to change during the 3.4 
series of releases. Idle is also exceptional in getting uncategorized 
changes in maintenance releases, so each x.y.z release needs a copy of 
the Idle doc chapter that is both up-to-date and frozen as of x.y.z. 
Making this happen is still a work-in-progress.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web