Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #61112 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-12-05 22:16 -0700 |
| Last post | 2013-12-05 22:16 -0700 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Embedding multiple interpreters Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-12-05 22:16 -0700
| From | Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-05 22:16 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Embedding multiple interpreters |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3622.1386307033.18130.python-list@python.org> |
On 12/05/2013 07:34 PM, Garthy wrote: > - My fallback if I can't do this is to implement each instance in a > dedicated *process* rather than per-thread. However, there is a > significant cost to doing this that I would rather not incur. What cost is this? Are you speaking of cost in terms of what you the programmer would have to do, cost in terms of setting things up and communicating with the process, or the cost of creating a process vs a thread? If it's the last, on most modern OS's (particularly Linux), it's really not that expensive. On Linux the cost of threads and processes are nearly the same.
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web