Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #61111 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-12-05 20:05 -0800 |
| Last post | 2013-12-05 20:05 -0800 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Recursive generator for combinations of a multiset? Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2013-12-05 20:05 -0800
| From | Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-05 20:05 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Recursive generator for combinations of a multiset? |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3621.1386302707.18130.python-list@python.org> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:46 PM, John O'Hagan <research@johnohagan.com>wrote: > > Short story: the subject says it all, so if you have an answer already, > fire away. Below is the long story of what I'm using it for, and why I > think it needs to be recursive. It may even be of more general > interest in terms of filtering the results of generators. > > Any suggestions? > I've updated my code at http://stromberg.dnsalias.org/svn/anagrams/trunk/; It's multiword now. It can blast through the word "punishment" in 4 seconds, but for "The public art galleries" it ate about 7 gigabytes of RAM and ran for more than a day before I killed it. I believe it's an exponential problem. Parallelization might help, but it'd probably take a lot of RAM that way. Maybe the RAM use would be better with CPython, but it's much faster with Pypy; I did most of my testing with Pypy 2.2.
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web