Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #92403 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-06-10 15:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-06-10 15:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Did the 3.4.4 docs get published early? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-06-10 15:40 +0100
| From | Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-10 15:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Did the 3.4.4 docs get published early? |
| Message-ID | <mailman.345.1433947247.13271.python-list@python.org> |
On 10/06/2015 15:11, Nicholas Chammas wrote: > For example, here is a "New in version 3.4.4" method: > > https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio-task.html#asyncio.ensure_future > > However, the latest release appears to be 3.4.3: > > https://www.python.org/downloads/ > > Is this normal, or did the 3.4.4 docs somehow get published early by > mistake? > > Nick > I suspect that this is due to a trainee pilot being let loose too early with the time machine. Failing that finger trouble when doing a commit. Thinking about it more likely the former rather than the latter :) -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web