Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #16854 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-12-09 04:37 +1100 |
| Last post | 2011-12-08 21:33 -0500 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: adding elements to set Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-09 04:37 +1100
Re: adding elements to set Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> - 2011-12-08 18:54 +0000
Re: adding elements to set Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-12-08 21:33 -0500
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-12-09 04:37 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: adding elements to set |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3437.1323365841.27778.python-list@python.org> |
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> wrote:
> The only thing that has changed (in 2.7) is the algorithm to calculate the
> hash value. The bits are rotated to turn the four least significant bits
> into the most signicant ones. According to a comment in Objects/objects.c
> the change leads to fewer hash collisions.
Interesting, but what I saw was this:
>>> class C(object):
def __init__(self, x):
self.x = x
def __eq__(self, other):
return self.x == other.x
>>> s=set()
>>> c1=C(1)
>>> s.add(c1)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<pyshell#163>", line 1, in <module>
s.add(c1)
TypeError: unhashable type: 'C'
(This is in IDLE from Python 3.2 on Windows.)
However, s.add(object()) works fine. So subclasses don't get that.
Odd. Makes sense though - you can't get this unexpected behaviour as
easily.
ChrisA
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-12-08 18:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <Xns9FB5C04A15F82duncanbooth@127.0.0.1> |
| In reply to | #16854 |
Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> wrote: >> The only thing that has changed (in 2.7) is the algorithm to >> calculate the hash value. The bits are rotated to turn the four least >> significant bits into the most signicant ones. According to a comment >> in Objects/objects.c the change leads to fewer hash collisions. > > Interesting, but what I saw was this: > >>>> class C(object): > > def __init__(self, x): > self.x = x > > def __eq__(self, other): > return self.x == other.x > >>>> s=set() >>>> c1=C(1) >>>> s.add(c1) > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "<pyshell#163>", line 1, in <module> > s.add(c1) > TypeError: unhashable type: 'C' > > (This is in IDLE from Python 3.2 on Windows.) > > However, s.add(object()) works fine. So subclasses don't get that. > Odd. Makes sense though - you can't get this unexpected behaviour as > easily. > Yes, the documentation describes this although I don't think anything highlights that it is a change from Python 2.x: [http://docs.python.org/py3k/reference/datamodel.html] > If a class does not define an __eq__() method it should not define a > __hash__() operation either; if it defines __eq__() but not > __hash__(), its instances will not be usable as items in hashable > collections. If a class defines mutable objects and implements an > __eq__() method, it should not implement __hash__(), since the > implementation of hashable collections requires that a key’s hash > value is immutable (if the object’s hash value changes, it will be in > the wrong hash bucket). So in Python 2.x you could define __eq__ and get the default __hash__ which would break dictionaries. With Python 3.x defining __eq__ will disable the default __hash__ although if you subclass a class that has both methods you could still get in a mess by redefining one without the other. -- Duncan Booth http://kupuguy.blogspot.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-12-08 21:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3463.1323398033.27778.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #16861 |
On 12/8/2011 1:54 PM, Duncan Booth wrote: > Yes, the documentation describes this although I don't think anything > highlights that it is a change from Python 2.x: > > [http://docs.python.org/py3k/reference/datamodel.html] The Python 3 docs are 're-based' on 3.0, with change notes going forward from that new base. This change should have been in 'What's New in Python 3.0', though I did not find it. -- Terry Jan Reedy
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web