Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #54239 > unrolled thread

Re: Is %z broken for return values of time.gmtime()?

Started byrandom832@fastmail.us
First post2013-09-16 13:56 -0400
Last post2013-09-16 13:56 -0400
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Is %z broken for return values of time.gmtime()? random832@fastmail.us - 2013-09-16 13:56 -0400

#54239 — Re: Is %z broken for return values of time.gmtime()?

Fromrandom832@fastmail.us
Date2013-09-16 13:56 -0400
SubjectRe: Is %z broken for return values of time.gmtime()?
Message-ID<mailman.34.1379354165.18130.python-list@python.org>
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013, at 9:15, Michael Schwarz wrote:
> According to the documentation of time.gmtime(), it returns a struct_time
> in UTC, but %z is replaced by +0100, which is the UTC offset of my OS’s
> time zone without DST, but DST is currently in effect here (but was not
> at the timestamp passed to gmtime()).

The struct_time type does not include information about what timezone it
is in.

You can use datetime.datetime (e.g. datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(40 *
365 * 86400,datetime.timezone.utc) - the datetime.datetime class has a
strftime method.

You should be aware that %F and %T are not portable and won't work on
windows for example.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web