Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #60476 > unrolled thread

Re: general ConfigParser question [PS]

Started byTim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com>
First post2013-11-25 18:35 -0600
Last post2013-11-25 18:35 -0600
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: general ConfigParser question [PS] Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-11-25 18:35 -0600

#60476 — Re: general ConfigParser question [PS]

FromTim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com>
Date2013-11-25 18:35 -0600
SubjectRe: general ConfigParser question [PS]
Message-ID<mailman.3212.1385426076.18130.python-list@python.org>
On 2013-11-25 18:29, Tim Chase wrote:
> On 2013-11-25 18:32, Rita wrote:
> > I was wondering if the default ConfigParser can handle multi line
> > strings (especially in the relate section)
> > 
> > [Relate]
> > data="parent process A child process B
> > Parent process B child process C
> 
> Yes, though I seem to recall that subsequent lines have to be
> indented

Just following up, it's mentioned in the docs, but it's easy to miss:

"""with continuations in the style of RFC 822 (see section 3.1.1,
“LONG HEADER FIELDS”);"""

-tkc

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web