Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #55702 > unrolled thread

Re: [python-list] - what do you think ?

Started by"Rhodri James" <rhodri@wildebst.demon.co.uk>
First post2011-02-08 22:03 +0000
Last post2011-02-08 20:59 -0500
Articles 4 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [python-list] - what do you think ? "Rhodri James" <rhodri@wildebst.demon.co.uk> - 2011-02-08 22:03 +0000
    Re: [python-list] - what do you think ? Stephen Hansen <me+list/python@ixokai.io> - 2011-02-09 00:36 -0800
    Re: [python-list] - what do you think ? "Rhodri James" <rhodri@wildebst.demon.co.uk> - 2011-02-09 02:12 +0000
    Re: [python-list] - what do you think ? David Robinow <drobinow@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 20:59 -0500

#55702 — Re: [python-list] - what do you think ?

From"Rhodri James" <rhodri@wildebst.demon.co.uk>
Date2011-02-08 22:03 +0000
SubjectRe: [python-list] - what do you think ?
Message-ID<op.vqlt8dbda8ncjz@gnudebst>
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 12:18:50 -0000, <przemolicc@poczta.fm> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 10:16:42PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
>> przemolicc@poczta.fm writes:
>>
>> > I have just subscribed to this python-list@ and this is my N list.
>> > Usually many mailing lists use square brackets to identify its name
>> > when you have e-mails from different forums.
>> > Would you consider adding [] to this list also ?
>>
>> No thank you.
>>
>> Either your mail client already knows how to filter messages
>> appropriately depending on which mailing list they came from; or, you
>> should use a better mail client.
>
> mutt is quite good ;-)

Definitely a step up from Outlook :-)

>> Either way, please don't ask for the subject lines to be munged.
>
> Any technical reason why not ?

python-list reflects and is reflected by the comp.lang.python newsgroup  
(and gmane, etc).  People on the newsgroup side won't add [tags] for you,  
and won't thank you for breaking the minimal threading that can be  
inferred from titles if the list reflector adds stuff unexpectedly.

-- 
Rhodri James *-* Wildebeest Herder to the Masses

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#55778

FromStephen Hansen <me+list/python@ixokai.io>
Date2011-02-09 00:36 -0800
Message-ID<mailman.32.1297240628.1633.python-list@python.org>
In reply to#55702

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 2/8/11 8:00 PM, Vivek Shrivastava wrote:
> I think that will help people like me who just depend on gmail, and I
> know there are various ways to do filtering in gmail, but just addition
> of the tag in [ ] will help avoiding those.. I kindly second that..

.. yeah, no.

Let's not screw up everyone's life to help those who are using _Gmail_
who don't want to take advantage of Gmail's capability to PERFECTLY
filter the group into a folder without it.

You /just/ depend on Gmail? You want to infringe on everyone else so...
you can... _avoid_ er, using your client to sort your mails into a
folder/label? Gee, thanks, no.

Click on this message.

There's this "Show Details" button that appears at the top of it. Click
that.

Then there's this line that says "mailing list", followed by
"python-list.python.org"

Then there's this super easy link added right next that you can click.

Voila, it fills out everything you need have just Gmail, depend just on
Gmail, and sort your messages in a very usable way, without screwing
with everyone else and stealing away their valuable horizontal space.

-- 

   Stephen Hansen
   ... Also: Ixokai
   ... Mail: me+list/python (AT) ixokai (DOT) io
   ... Blog: http://meh.ixokai.io/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#55817

From"Rhodri James" <rhodri@wildebst.demon.co.uk>
Date2011-02-09 02:12 +0000
Message-ID<op.vql5qtzca8ncjz@gnudebst>
In reply to#55702
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 01:59:46 -0000, David Robinow <drobinow@gmail.com>  
wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Rhodri James
> <rhodri@wildebst.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>> On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 12:18:50 -0000, <przemolicc@poczta.fm> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 10:16:42PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
>>>> Either your mail client already knows how to filter messages
>>>> appropriately depending on which mailing list they came from; or, you
>>>> should use a better mail client.
>>>
>>> mutt is quite good ;-)
>>
>> Definitely a step up from Outlook :-)
> Not sure what your beef with Outlook is, but it does know how to
> filter messages appropriately.
> [I've never used mutt.]

Nor have I, but according to the manual it can handle mailing lists
perfectly well.  mutt has been around for a while.

-- 
Rhodri James *-* Wildebeest Herder to the Masses

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#55970

FromDavid Robinow <drobinow@gmail.com>
Date2011-02-08 20:59 -0500
Message-ID<mailman.25.1297216788.1633.python-list@python.org>
In reply to#55702
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Rhodri James
<rhodri@wildebst.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 12:18:50 -0000, <przemolicc@poczta.fm> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 10:16:42PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
>>> Either your mail client already knows how to filter messages
>>> appropriately depending on which mailing list they came from; or, you
>>> should use a better mail client.
>>
>> mutt is quite good ;-)
>
> Definitely a step up from Outlook :-)
Not sure what your beef with Outlook is, but it does know how to
filter messages appropriately.
[I've never used mutt.]

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web