Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #16454 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-11-30 17:12 -0500 |
| Last post | 2011-12-01 15:33 +1100 |
| Articles | 4 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: How convert a list string to a real list Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-11-30 17:12 -0500
Re: How convert a list string to a real list Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-01 03:42 +0000
Re: How convert a list string to a real list Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-12-01 15:25 +1100
Re: How convert a list string to a real list Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com> - 2011-12-01 15:33 +1100
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-11-30 17:12 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: How convert a list string to a real list |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3175.1322691152.27778.python-list@python.org> |
On 11/30/2011 3:58 AM, Peter Otten wrote:
> Terry Reedy wrote:
>
>> On 11/30/2011 1:20 AM, 郭军权 wrote:
>>> Good after
>>> I have a string liststr = '["aaaa","bbbb","ccc"]' ,and I need convert it
>>> to a list like list = ["aaaa","bbbb","ccc"],what can id do?
>>
>> The easiest -- and most dangerous -- way is
>> >>> eval('["aaaa","bbbb","ccc"]')
>> ['aaaa', 'bbbb', 'ccc']
>>
>> But DO NOT eval unexamined strings from untrusted sources. The reason is
>> that it is much the same as letting an untrusted person sit unsupervised
>> as the keyboard of your computer with a command window open. You would
>> not want to eval
>> "from os import system; system('<command to delete files>')"
>> where '<command...>' is replaced by something obnoxious for your
>> operating system.
>
> You can avoid these problems with ast.literal_eval():
>
> literal_eval(node_or_string)
> Safely evaluate an expression node or a string containing a Python
> expression. The string or node provided may only consist of the
> following Python literal structures: strings, numbers, tuples, lists,
> dicts, booleans, and None.
I keep forgetting that someone thought to solve the problem of eval
being both convinient and dangerous. Maybe if I type it once, I will
remember.
>>> import ast
>>> ast.literal_eval('["aaaa","bbbb","ccc"]')
['aaaa', 'bbbb', 'ccc']
I think it would be better if safe_eval were available as an easily
accessible builtin and dangerous_eval were tucked away in a module ;-).
--
Terry Jan Reedy
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-12-01 03:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <4ed6f7be$0$29986$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #16454 |
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:12:10 -0500, Terry Reedy wrote: > I think it would be better if safe_eval were available as an easily > accessible builtin and dangerous_eval were tucked away in a module ;-). +100000 -- Steven
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-12-01 15:25 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <87ehwo5364.fsf@benfinney.id.au> |
| In reply to | #16469 |
Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> writes: > On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:12:10 -0500, Terry Reedy wrote: > > > I think it would be better if safe_eval were available as an easily > > accessible builtin and dangerous_eval were tucked away in a module ;-). > > +100000 You do realise that any vote outside the range −1 through +1 is invalid, right? Every person gets a maximum of 1, positive or negative. Outside that, the vote police come to kick you off the internet. -- \ “Everything is futile.” —Marvin of Borg | `\ | _o__) | Ben Finney
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-12-01 15:33 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3187.1322714034.27778.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #16472 |
Dammit, been awake too long researching on the Internet, but I finally reached the Last Page On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> wrote: > Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> writes: > >> On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:12:10 -0500, Terry Reedy wrote: >> >> > I think it would be better if safe_eval were available as an easily >> > accessible builtin and dangerous_eval were tucked away in a module ;-). >> >> +100000 > > You do realise that any vote outside the range -1 through +1 is invalid, > right? Every person gets a maximum of 1, positive or negative. Outside > that, the vote police come to kick you off the internet. > > -- > \ "Everything is futile." --Marvin of Borg | > `\ | > _o__) | > Ben Finney > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web