Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #16236 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chris Withers <chris@simplistix.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-11-25 18:54 +0000 |
| Last post | 2011-11-25 18:54 +0000 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: What replaces log4py under Python 3.2? Chris Withers <chris@simplistix.co.uk> - 2011-11-25 18:54 +0000
| From | Chris Withers <chris@simplistix.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-11-25 18:54 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: What replaces log4py under Python 3.2? |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3048.1322250146.27778.python-list@python.org> |
On 22/11/2011 18:32, Rob Richardson wrote:
> My company has been using the log4py library for a long time. A co-worker recently installed Python 3.2, and log4py will no longer compile. (OK, I know that's the wrong word, but you know what I mean.) What logging package should be used now?
How about the core logging package included in Python itself?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web