Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #32386 > unrolled thread

Re: Immutability and Python

Started byandrea crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com>
First post2012-10-29 15:48 +0000
Last post2012-10-29 15:48 +0000
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Immutability and Python andrea crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 15:48 +0000

#32386 — Re: Immutability and Python

Fromandrea crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com>
Date2012-10-29 15:48 +0000
SubjectRe: Immutability and Python
Message-ID<mailman.3021.1351525692.27098.python-list@python.org>
2012/10/29 andrea crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com>:
>>
>
> Well sure but it doesn't modify the first object, just creates a new
> one.  There are in general good reasons to do that, for example I can
> then compose things nicely:
>
> num.increment().increment()
>
> or I can parallelize operations safely not caring about the order of
> operations.
>
> But while I do this all the time with more functional languages, I
> don't tend to do exactly the same in Python, because I have the
> impression that is not worth, but maybe I'm wrong..


By the way on this topic there is a great talk by the creator of
Clojure: http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Value-Values

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web