Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #196376 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Rob Cliffe <rob.cliffe@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-07-06 11:49 +0100 |
| Last post | 2024-07-07 03:49 +0000 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Best use of "open" context manager Rob Cliffe <rob.cliffe@btinternet.com> - 2024-07-06 11:49 +0100
Re: Best use of "open" context manager (Posting On Python-List Prohibited) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-07 03:49 +0000
| From | Rob Cliffe <rob.cliffe@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-07-06 11:49 +0100 |
| Subject | Best use of "open" context manager |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3.1720263159.2981.python-list@python.org> |
Consider this scenario (which I ran into in real life):
I want to open a text file and do a lot of processing on the lines
of that file.
If the file does not exist I want to take appropriate action, e.g.
print an error message and abort the program.
I might write it like this:
try:
with open(FileName) as f:
for ln in f:
print("I do a lot of processing here")
# Many lines of code here .....
except FileNotFoundError:
print(f"File {FileName} not found")
sys.exit()
but this violates the principle that a "try" suite should be kept small,
so that only targeted exceptions are trapped,
not to mention that having "try" and "except" far apart decreases
readability.
Or I might write it like this:
try:
f = open(FileName) as f:
FileLines = f.readlines()
except FileNotFoundError:
print(f"File {FileName} not found")
sys.exit()
# I forgot to put "f.close()" here -:)
for ln in File Lines:
print("I do a lot of processing here")
# Many lines of code here .....
but this loses the benefits of using "open" as a context manager,
and would also be unacceptable if the file was too large to read into
memory.
Really I would like to write something like
try:
with open(FileName) as f:
except FileNotFoundError:
print(f"File {FileName} not found")
sys.exit()
else: # or "finally:"
for ln in f:
print("I do a lot of processing here")
# Many lines of code here .....
but this of course does not work because by the time we get to "for ln
in f:" the file has been closed so we get
ValueError: I/O operation on closed file
I could modify the last attempt to open the file twice, which would
work, but seems like a kludge (subject to race condition, inefficient).
Is there a better / more Pythonic solution?
Best wishes
Rob Cliffe
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-07-07 03:49 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Best use of "open" context manager (Posting On Python-List Prohibited) |
| Message-ID | <v6d38o$6dlv$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #196376 |
On 6 Jul 2024 11:46:33 GMT, Stefan Ram wrote:
>>but this of course does not work because by the time we get to "for ln
>>in f:" the file has been closed so we get ValueError: I/O operation on
>>closed file
>
> try:
> f = open( FileName )
> except FileNotFoundError:
> print( f"File {FileName} not found" )
> sys.exit()
> else:
> with f:
> # put this into a separate function if it gets too long here.
> for ln in f:
> print( "I do a lot of processing here" )
> # Many lines of code here .....
f = open(filename, "rt")
for ln in f :
... do your processing ...
1) Let the error exception be reported directly, whether it’s “file not
found”, or “permission error”, or some other reason; why bother to handle
it when you don’t even know what to do anyway?
2) Notice that a file open for reading automatically gets closed when it
goes out of scope (feature of CPython and all the other good
implementations).
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web