Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #40655 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jason Hsu <jhsu802701@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-03-06 10:03 -0800 |
| Last post | 2013-03-08 07:35 -0900 |
| Articles | 6 on this page of 26 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
Why is Ruby on Rails more popular than Django? Jason Hsu <jhsu802701@gmail.com> - 2013-03-06 10:03 -0800
Re: Why is Ruby on Rails more popular than Django? "marduk@python.net" <marduk@python.net> - 2013-03-06 13:24 -0500
Re: Why is Ruby on Rails more popular than Django? Tim Johnson <tim@akwebsoft.com> - 2013-03-06 10:16 -0900
Re: Why is Ruby on Rails more popular than Django? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-03-06 23:58 +0000
Re: Why is Ruby on Rails more popular than Django? alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2013-03-06 17:08 -0800
Re: Why is Ruby on Rails more popular than Django? Albert Hopkins <marduk@letterboxes.org> - 2013-03-06 21:13 -0500
Re: Why is Ruby on Rails more popular than Django? Tim Johnson <tim@akwebsoft.com> - 2013-03-06 17:55 -0900
Re: Why is Ruby on Rails more popular than Django? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-03-06 18:58 -0800
Re: Why is Ruby on Rails more popular than Django? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-03-06 22:09 -0800
Re: Why is Ruby on Rails more popular than Django? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-03-07 09:28 +0000
Re: Why is Ruby on Rails more popular than Django? Sven <svenito@gmail.com> - 2013-03-07 09:52 +0000
Re: Why is Ruby on Rails more popular than Django? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-03-07 10:00 -0800
Re: Why is Ruby on Rails more popular than Django? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-03-07 08:20 -0800
Re: Why is Ruby on Rails more popular than Django? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-03-08 03:33 +1100
Re: Why is Ruby on Rails more popular than Django? "Russell E. Owen" <rowen@uw.edu> - 2013-03-07 13:08 -0800
Re: Why is Ruby on Rails more popular than Django? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-03-07 19:46 -0800
Re: Why is Ruby on Rails more popular than Django? rh <richard_hubbe11@lavabit.com> - 2013-03-07 20:50 -0800
Re: Why is Ruby on Rails more popular than Django? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-03-08 08:19 -0800
Re: Why is Ruby on Rails more popular than Django? rh <richard_hubbe11@lavabit.com> - 2013-03-08 09:12 -0800
Re: Why is Ruby on Rails more popular than Django? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-03-08 09:30 -0800
Re: Why is Ruby on Rails more popular than Django? rh <richard_hubbe11@lavabit.com> - 2013-03-08 13:24 -0800
Re: Why is Ruby on Rails more popular than Django? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-03-08 17:47 +0000
Re: Why is Ruby on Rails more popular than Django? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-03-08 20:40 -0800
Re: Why is Ruby on Rails more popular than Django? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-03-06 20:16 -0800
Re: Why is Ruby on Rails more popular than Django? rh <richard_hubbe11@lavabit.com> - 2013-03-07 20:43 -0800
Re: Why is Ruby on Rails more popular than Django? Tim Johnson <tim@akwebsoft.com> - 2013-03-08 07:35 -0900
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | rh <richard_hubbe11@lavabit.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-03-08 13:24 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3100.1362777810.2939.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #40876 |
On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 09:30:20 -0800 (PST) rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 8, 9:50 am, rh <richard_hubb...@lavabit.com> wrote: > > > Choices are good. > > > > Having one choice is a mess. And look back at history and current > > events if you don't see that. > > > See http://www.perl.com/pub/1999/03/pm.html for how a real post-modern > hip language gives endless choice. Also called TIMTOWTDI. Or perl Didn't read that. Make django the defacto python webdev platform then. It won't make django better, maybe it will make more people use it because they will get a false sense that it must be good because it's defacto. I see that pycon is all about django, best of luck with it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-03-08 17:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <513a2437$0$30001$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #40694 |
On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 18:58:12 -0800, rusi wrote: >> My questions: >> 1. Why is Ruby on Rails much more popular than Django? > > "Where there is choice there is no freedom" > http://www.jiddu-krishnamurti.net/en/1954/1954-03-03-jiddu- krishnamurti-8th-public-talk Surely that should be, where there is NO choice there is no freedom. You must work down the mines every day until you die. Are you free? You must use Rails for your web app. Are you free? The "Paradox of Choice" is real, that is, *too* much choice can lead to paralysis. Freedom is not an unmitigated good. But there are ways to work around that, starting with the simple fact that products often are aimed at niche markets and so are not actually direct competitors. The hard part is deciding what niche you exist in, not what product you want. [...] > GvR understood and rigorously implemented a dictum that Nicklaus Wirth > formulated decades ago -- "The most important thing about language > design is what to leave out." Therefore Python is a beautiful language. > Unfortunately the same leadership did not carry over to web frameworks > and so we have a mess. The entire software ecosystem is not equivalent to designing a single language. Apart from the practical matter that it would require a totalitarian dictator to declare that there is One True web framework which everyone must use on pain of death, there is also the little matter that individual products can concentrate on different strengths. No one product can solve all problems -- you can't have a web framework which is simultaneously lightweight for those with small needs AND heavyweight for those with large needs. (Or at least, it is *incredibly difficult* to have a single product be all things to all people.) 'I'm sure we can pull together, sir.' Lord Vetinari raised his eyebrows. 'Oh, I do hope not, I really do hope not. Pulling together is the aim of despotism and tyranny. Free men pull in all kinds of directions.' He smiled. 'It's the only way to make progress.' - Terry Pratchett, "The Truth" -- Steven
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-03-08 20:40 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <01322e07-cc18-4f02-9828-beb0cdc7064a@kt16g2000pbb.googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #40877 |
On Mar 8, 10:47 pm, Steven D'Aprano <steve +comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote: > On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 18:58:12 -0800, rusi wrote: > >> My questions: > >> 1. Why is Ruby on Rails much more popular than Django? > > > "Where there is choice there is no freedom" > >http://www.jiddu-krishnamurti.net/en/1954/1954-03-03-jiddu-krishnamurti-8th-public-talk > > Surely that should be, where there is NO choice there is no freedom. > > The "Paradox of Choice" is real, that is, *too* much choice can lead to > paralysis. Thanks for that 'google-tip'. I guess a secular outlook would have wider reach than a guru like Krishnamurti. In any case http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Paradox_of_Choice:_Why_More_Is_Less says more or less what Krishnamurti does (apart from the absolutes).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-03-06 20:16 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <322c7d37-5fb3-4f15-b88f-9c8a83b7757b@kw7g2000pbb.googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #40655 |
On Mar 6, 11:03 pm, Jason Hsu <jhsu802...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm currently in the process of learning Ruby on Rails. I'm going through the Rails for Zombies tutorial, and I'm seeing the power of Rails. > > I still need to get a Ruby on Rails site up and running for the world to see. (My first serious RoR site will profile mutual funds from a value investor's point of view.) > > I have an existing web site and project called Doppler Value Investing (dopplervalueinvesting.com) that uses Drupal to display the web pages and Python web-scraping scripts to create *.csv and *.html files showing information on individual stocks. My site has a tacked-on feel to it, and I definitely want to change the setup. > > At a future time, I will rebuild my Doppler Value Investing web site in either Ruby on Rails or Django. The Ruby on Rails route will require rewriting my Python script in Ruby. The Django route will require learning Django. (I'm not sure which one will be easier.) It is a natural programmer instinct that a uni-language solution is felt cleaner than a multi-language one. This feeling is valid under the following assumptions: - You are starting from ground up - The investment in learning something new is not considered significant In your case, with a site already up (maybe with a tacked on feel) and learning django a significant effort compared to directly coding in RoR, you should look at polyglot solutions more carefully (eg not directly relevant ... something like http://www.igvita.com/2009/03/20/ruby-polyglot-talking-with-erlang/ ) IOW code your site in RoR and call out to your python scraper-scripts may be an option to consider.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rh <richard_hubbe11@lavabit.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-03-07 20:43 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3067.1362717774.2939.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #40655 |
On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 17:55:12 -0900 Tim Johnson <tim@akwebsoft.com> wrote: > > I believe that indifference on the part of Python to fastcgi is a > self-inflicted wound. I don't believe that there is any good > excuse for such indifference, except for a sort of bureaucratic > inertia. It's sad, when you consider how well python is designed Python is not indifferent to fastcgi, django is indifferent to fastcgi. > and how crappily PHP is designed and how easy it is to set up and > deploy drupal in the same environment. I speak from my own > experience.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim Johnson <tim@akwebsoft.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-03-08 07:35 -0900 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3085.1362760534.2939.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #40655 |
* rh <richard_hubbe11@lavabit.com> [130307 20:21]: > On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 17:55:12 -0900 > Tim Johnson <tim@akwebsoft.com> wrote: > > > > > I believe that indifference on the part of Python to fastcgi is a > > self-inflicted wound. I don't believe that there is any good > > excuse for such indifference, except for a sort of bureaucratic > > inertia. It's sad, when you consider how well python is designed > > Python is not indifferent to fastcgi, django is indifferent to fastcgi. > > > and how crappily PHP is designed and how easy it is to set up and > > deploy drupal in the same environment. I speak from my own > > experience. > > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list I stand corrected, that was a typo. thanks -- Tim tim at tee jay forty nine dot com or akwebsoft dot com http://www.akwebsoft.com
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web