Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #21042 > unrolled thread

Re: Fwd: Question about PyXML and python's stdlib xml

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Fwd: Question about PyXML and python's stdlib xml Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2012-02-29 15:48 +0100

#21042 — Re: Fwd: Question about PyXML and python's stdlib xml

Roman Rakus, 29.02.2012 15:33:
> I'm forwarding this message to python-list, since I didn't get answer on
> xml-sig ML

I didn't see a message from you on that list.


> I have concerns about PyXML and stdlib xml included directly in python.
> Currently (in Fedora) python is trying to import PyXML, which means
> other results when you have and haven't PyXML installed.

What kind of "other results"?


> Furthermore, python's xml provides "dom", "parsers", "sax" and "etree".
> PyXML provides  'dom', 'marshal', 'parsers', 'sax', 'schema', 'utils',
> 'xpath' and 'xslt'. Some modules are duplicated. Does PyXML provides
> more functionality in those modules? Is python's xml better, same or
> worse then PyXML?

PyXML was meant as an extension and hooked into the stdlib XML support.
That's only one of the reasons why it's broken now.


> Anyway, python's xml is newer - is PyXML deprecated?

Yes. It's a dead project.


> Please keep me in CC, I'm not subscribed to the list.

That may be the problem in the xml-sig case also.

Stefan

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web