Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #32245 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Gelonida N <gelonida@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-10-27 01:39 +0200 |
| Last post | 2012-10-27 14:18 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: SSH Connection with Python Gelonida N <gelonida@gmail.com> - 2012-10-27 01:39 +0200
Re: SSH Connection with Python Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-10-26 20:21 -0400
Re: SSH Connection with Python Gelonida N <gelonida@gmail.com> - 2012-10-27 14:18 +0200
| From | Gelonida N <gelonida@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-10-27 01:39 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: SSH Connection with Python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2915.1351294793.27098.python-list@python.org> |
On 10/25/2012 12:47 PM, Kamlesh Mutha wrote: > You can use paramiko module. Very easy to use. > > > I also use paramiko for a small script. However I'm a little hesitant to use paramik for new code. The web page says: "last updated 21-May-2011" and the github url http://github.com/robey/paramiko/ yields me a 404 However I didn't really find any alternative. For cross platform scripts (Linux / windows) subprocess is not such a good alternative. Another problem is, that paramiko depends on pycrypto 2.1+ which doesn't exist as binary release for python 2.7 Is fabric capable of performing scp / sftp Is there any other library as alternative?
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-10-26 20:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <roy-B682C5.20214826102012@news.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #32245 |
In article <mailman.2915.1351294793.27098.python-list@python.org>, Gelonida N <gelonida@gmail.com> wrote: > Another problem is, that paramiko depends on pycrypto 2.1+ > which doesn't exist as binary release for python 2.7 I'm running paramiko-1.7.6 with python 2.7.3 on my Ubunto Precise box. I'm reasonably sure all I did was "pip install paramiko". On the other hand, it may have built it from source during the install. Generally, I just let pip do it's magic and don't worry about the details. If you're in an environment where you don't have the compiler tool chain, you may be more constrained. > Is fabric capable of performing scp / sftp Fabric uses ssh to make connections, and it is capable of copying files. For all intents and purposes, I'd say that means it is capable of "performing scp / sftp" (both of which are just front-ends to the same basic ssh protocol. But, keep in mind that fabric depends on paramiko. If you can't get paramiko installed, you probably can't get fabric either.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gelonida N <gelonida@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-10-27 14:18 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2933.1351340302.27098.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #32255 |
On 10/27/2012 02:21 AM, Roy Smith wrote: > In article <mailman.2915.1351294793.27098.python-list@python.org>, > Gelonida N <gelonida@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Another problem is, that paramiko depends on pycrypto 2.1+ >> which doesn't exist as binary release for python 2.7 > > I'm running paramiko-1.7.6 with python 2.7.3 on my Ubunto Precise box. > I'm reasonably sure all I did was "pip install paramiko". Apologies. I failed to mention, that I was talking about Windows not Linux. I use Python for applications, that should work under Linux and under Windows. > > But, keep in mind that fabric depends on paramiko. If you can't get > paramiko installed, you probably can't get fabric either. > Thanks, that's good to know, so I don't have to bother looking at farbic (at least not as solution on windows python 2.7 without having to try to recompile pycrypto myself)
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web