Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #26331 > unrolled thread

Re: Why 'Flat is better than nested'

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Why 'Flat is better than nested' Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-07-31 19:57 -0400

#26331 — Re: Why 'Flat is better than nested'

On 7/31/2012 5:49 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Ifthikhan Nazeem <iftecan2000@gmail.com> wrote:
>> as many as (about) 2*N - log2(N) parent child relationships
>>
>> I would like to know how did you come up with the above formula? Forgive my
>> ignorance.

By non-rigorous experimentation, which did not quite count everything.

> I come up with 2N - 2 myself.  If there are N leaf nodes and N - 1
> non-leaf nodes, then there are 2N - 1 total nodes, each of which has
> one parent except for the root.  That's 2N - 2 parent-child
> relationships.

That looks right. I was trying to think recursively, which in this case 
is more rather than less complicated. That actually sharpens my original 
point. N-1 new nodes and 2N-2 new relationships is 3N-3 new entities.

The internal node limit of N-1 only applies to full-proper-strict binary 
trees without one-child internal nodes. Otherwise, a single leaf node 
could have an indefinite number of ancestors.

from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_tree
"A full binary tree (sometimes proper binary tree or 2-tree or strictly 
binary tree) is a tree in which every node other than the leaves has two 
children."

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web