Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #46987 > unrolled thread

RE: Do you consider Python a 4GL? Why (not)?

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  RE: Do you consider Python a 4GL? Why (not)? Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com> - 2013-06-05 03:38 +0300

#46987 — RE: Do you consider Python a 4GL? Why (not)?

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

I don't have an opinion yet, but I've found contradictory evidence from many sources, such as:

"A domain-specific language (DSL) is a type of programming language or specification language in software development and domain engineering dedicated to a particular problem domain,
[...]
The opposite is:
a general-purpose programming language, such as C, Java or Python,"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain-specific_programming_language

Since, 4GL is considered a subset of DSLs, this wiki page doesn't consider Python a 4GL.

Is is true? Why???
 		 	   		  

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web