Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #46985 > unrolled thread

Re: Do you consider Python a 4GL? Why (not)?

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Do you consider Python a 4GL? Why (not)? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-06-04 19:14 -0500

#46985 — Re: Do you consider Python a 4GL? Why (not)?

On 2013-06-05 02:53, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
> Do you consider Python a 4GL? Why (not)?

Of course it's a 4GL ("4 Guido Language").  You think he wrote it for
somebody else?

Unless you have some magical list of criteria that makes your own
definition of "4GL", in which case you should look at your list of
those "4GL" definitions and weigh them against publicly known facts
about Python, yielding the answer to your question. :-P

-tkc

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web