Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #90196 > unrolled thread

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-05-09 09:02 +1000
    Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-09 12:37 +1000
      Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-05-09 13:56 +1000
      Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Tim Delaney <timothy.c.delaney@gmail.com> - 2015-05-10 07:34 +1000

#90196 — Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Mail Delivery Subsystem
<mailer-daemon@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>
>      abuse@intsystech.com
>
> Technical details of permanent failure:
> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain intsystech.com by mx01.1and1.com. [74.208.5.21].
>
> The error that the other server returned was:
> 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable

Thanks, that saves me the trouble of wondering if they'll deal with
it. Flag as spam, folks, flag as spam. They breach protocol by not
accepting abuse@.

ChrisA

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#90206

On Sat, 9 May 2015 09:02 am, Chris Angelico wrote:

> Thanks, that saves me the trouble of wondering if they'll deal with
> it. Flag as spam, folks, flag as spam. They breach protocol by not
> accepting abuse@.

OMG, you mean spammers ignore long standing Internet conventions for dealing
with misuse of email???

I see the original email didn't separate the body of the message from the
user's signature with a '-- ' either.

WILL THEIR CRIMES NEVER END????/??



*wink*

-- 
Steven

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#90209

On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Steven D'Aprano
<steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote:
> On Sat, 9 May 2015 09:02 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> Thanks, that saves me the trouble of wondering if they'll deal with
>> it. Flag as spam, folks, flag as spam. They breach protocol by not
>> accepting abuse@.
>
> OMG, you mean spammers ignore long standing Internet conventions for dealing
> with misuse of email???
>
> I see the original email didn't separate the body of the message from the
> user's signature with a '-- ' either.
>
> WILL THEIR CRIMES NEVER END????/??

Yeah, I know, shocking. But I wanted to at least *try* doing the
normal and official thing, in the hopes that they were a legit company
that perhaps didn't realize what this looked like.

ChrisA

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#90354

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 9 May 2015 at 13:56, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Yeah, I know, shocking. But I wanted to at least *try* doing the
> normal and official thing, in the hopes that they were a legit company
> that perhaps didn't realize what this looked like.
>

By all means report to abuse@ in the future, but please do not CC the list.
My spam filters have learned to filter out most job spam automatically by
now, but it doesn't filter out your reply.

Tim Delaney

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web