Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #91570 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-05-31 14:42 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-06-01 14:51 +0000 |
| Articles | 4 on this page of 24 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
Using Python instead of Bash Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-31 14:42 +0200
Re: Using Python instead of Bash Alain Ketterlin <alain@universite-de-strasbourg.fr.invalid> - 2015-05-31 16:02 +0200
Re: Using Python instead of Bash Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-31 18:36 +0200
Re: Using Python instead of Bash Cem Karan <cfkaran2@gmail.com> - 2015-05-31 10:14 -0400
Re: Using Python instead of Bash Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-31 18:58 +0200
Re: Using Python instead of Bash Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-05-31 11:05 -0400
Re: Using Python instead of Bash Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-31 19:06 +0200
Re: Using Python instead of Bash Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-05-31 20:53 -0400
Re: Using Python instead of Bash Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-06-01 11:25 +0200
Re: Using Python instead of Bash Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-06-01 09:11 +0200
Re: Using Python instead of Bash Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2015-05-31 22:08 -0700
Re: Using Python instead of Bash Larry Hudson <orgnut@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-01 00:56 -0700
Re: Using Python instead of Bash Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2015-06-01 11:06 +0300
Re: Using Python instead of Bash alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2015-06-01 09:07 +0000
Re: Using Python instead of Bash Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-06-01 12:44 +0200
Re: Using Python instead of Bash Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-06-01 17:44 +0200
Re: Using Python instead of Bash Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-06-01 18:44 +0200
Re: Using Python instead of Bash Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-06-01 20:42 +0200
Re: Using Python instead of Bash Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-06-01 21:57 +0200
Re: Using Python instead of Bash Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-06-01 22:42 +0200
Re: Using Python instead of Bash Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-06-01 23:04 +0200
Re: Using Python instead of Bash Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-06-01 11:11 +0200
Re: Using Python instead of Bash Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-06-01 12:38 +0300
Re: Using Python instead of Bash Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-06-01 14:51 +0000
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-01 23:04 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <87a8wjjg37.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> |
| In reply to | #91713 |
Op Monday 1 Jun 2015 22:42 CEST schreef Laura Creighton: > In a message of Mon, 01 Jun 2015 21:57:05 +0200, Cecil Westerhof > writes: >>> Truly? That's (very close to) 7 inch by 9 inch, 177.8 mm x 228.6 >>> mm and 7 by 9 is what pre-metric Britian called 'Small Post >>> Quarto'. I wonder if this merely a coincidence, or does some >>> software really still like this size? How very weird. >> >> Well, it is possible I did not measure correctly. ;-) It is a 32 >> page booklet. >> >> -- >> Cecil Westerhof >> Senior Software Engineer >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof > > Ah, I have been misunderstanding the question. It's the booklet > itself that is 7 by 9, not the rasters (or whatever) you get when > you first scan the thing. Sorry about that. No problem. -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-01 11:11 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <87r3pvlrnk.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> |
| In reply to | #91630 |
Op Monday 1 Jun 2015 09:56 CEST schreef Larry Hudson: > On 05/31/2015 05:42 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote: >> I help someone that has problems reading. For this I take photo's >> of text, use convert from ImageMagick to make a good contrast >> (original paper is grey) and use lpr to print it a little bigger. >> > I''m wondering why you bother to take a photo, which then has to be > adjusted for quality. A screen-capture program is much easier and > immediately gives you a perfect(?) starting image. I am amazed about the technical progress: I did not know it was possible to take a screen-shot from a booklet. -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-01 12:38 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <878uc3ahuf.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> |
| In reply to | #91638 |
Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl>: > I am amazed about the technical progress: I did not know it was > possible to take a screen-shot from a booklet. Well, take a look at this video that demonstrates the possibilities of the technology: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOXQo7nURs0 Marko
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-01 14:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mkhrhu$9d5$1@reader1.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #91570 |
On 2015-05-31, Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> wrote:
> I help someone that has problems reading. For this I take photo's of
> text, use convert from ImageMagick to make a good contrast (original
> paper is grey) and use lpr to print it a little bigger.
>
> Normally I would implement this in Bash, but I thought it a good idea
> to implement it in Python.
Why? Is it difficult to do/maintain in Bash?
If you want to write Python, then you should write Python. You're
still writing Bash, so you should probably do it in Bash. If you just
want to invoke a set of external programs on a set of files, then Bash
is probably the right language to use: that's pretty much what Bash is
for: manipulating files by invoking other programs.
> This is my first try:
> import glob
> import subprocess
>
> treshold = 66
> count = 0
> for input in sorted(glob.glob('*.JPG')):
> count += 1
> output = '{0:02d}.png'.format(count)
> print('Going to convert {0} to {1}'.format(input, output))
> p = subprocess.Popen(['convert', '-threshold', '{0}%'.format(treshold), input, output])
> p.wait()
> print('Going to print {0}'.format(output))
> p = subprocess.Popen(['lpr', '-o', 'fit-to-page', '-o', 'media=A4', output])
> p.wait()
>
> There have to be some improvements: display before printing,
> possibility to change threshold, … But is this a good start, or
> should I do it differently?
If all the work is being done by making a series of calls to
subprocess, then you should think about using bash instead.
If you really do want to do this in Python, you can use a Python
binding to the ImageMagick libraries:
https://wiki.python.org/moin/ImageMagick
http://www.imagemagick.org/download/python/
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7895278/can-i-access-imagemagick-api-with-python
Or maybe you can use Pillow:
http://pillow.readthedocs.org/
https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow
https://python-pillow.github.io/
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! Of course, you
at UNDERSTAND about the PLAIDS
gmail.com in the SPIN CYCLE --
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web