Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #39971 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-02-26 17:57 +0100 |
| Last post | 2013-03-01 23:46 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: IMAP4_SSL and OpenSSL compatibility "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2013-02-26 17:57 +0100
Re: IMAP4_SSL and OpenSSL compatibility Matej Cepl <mcepl@redhat.com> - 2013-03-01 23:46 +0100
| From | "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-26 17:57 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: IMAP4_SSL and OpenSSL compatibility |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2553.1361897864.2939.python-list@python.org> |
Quoting "Antoine Pitrou" <solipsis@pitrou.net>:
> W. Martin Borgert <debacle <at> debian.org> writes:
>> When I add an ssl_version argument to the call to
>> ssl.wrap_socket() in imaplib.IMAP4_SSL.open(), I can connect to
>> the Exchange server without problems:
>>
>> self.sslobj = ssl.wrap_socket(self.sock, self.keyfile, self.certfile,
>> ssl_version = ssl.PROTOCOL_SSLv3)
>>
>> Would it make sense, to make this change in the Python standard
>> library?
>
> There is already the ssl_context option for that:
> http://docs.python.org/3.3/library/imaplib.html#imaplib.IMAP4_SSL
Many thanks! Two more questions:
1. Is there any plan to backport this Python >= 3.3 feature to
Python 2?
2. Would the following lines be correct for Python 3.3?
>>> import imaplib
>>> IMAP4_SSL("192.168.1.1.", ssl_context =
SSLContext(ssl.PROTOCOL_SSLv3))
Cheers
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Matej Cepl <mcepl@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-03-01 23:46 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <slrnkj2bti.knq.mcepl@wycliff.ceplovi.cz> |
| In reply to | #39971 |
On 2013-02-26, 16:57 GMT, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > 1. Is there any plan to backport this Python >= 3.3 feature to > Python 2? No, development of Python 2 ceased to exist (only important bugfixes or security fix will happen, IIRC) If you need advanced use of SSL, use pyOpenSSL (it has been ported to Python 3 already, so you won't loose any compatibility). Matěj
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web