Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #59257 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-11-13 10:16 +1100 |
| Last post | 2013-11-13 10:16 +1100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [Python-Dev] The pysandbox project is broken Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-13 10:16 +1100
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-13 10:16 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: [Python-Dev] The pysandbox project is broken |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2504.1384298207.18130.python-list@python.org> |
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner@gmail.com> wrote: > In 2010, a developper called Tav wrote a sandbox called "safelite.py": > the sandbox hides sensitive attributes to separate a trusted namespace > and an untrusted namespace. Ha, I come full circle. This was the exact project that brought me to this list (for better or for worse!), as we were trying to sandbox Python code inside C++. Same sort of thing - we wanted free access to whatever it could do in memory, but no FS or OS access (and limits on total memory and CPU usage, though they're less critical as I can use OS APIs to do that). Conclusion: Either utterly impossible, or so hard as to be not worth the hassle. We switched to JavaScript, though I do maintain some regret that we couldn't use the better language. It's probably too late for that project to switch back now (and I've left the company), but as a matter of intellectual curiosity, I'm still somewhat interested. ChrisA
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web