Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #31689 > unrolled thread

Re: len() on mutables vs. immutables

Started byDemian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com>
First post2012-10-18 15:25 -0700
Last post2012-10-18 15:25 -0700
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: len() on mutables vs. immutables Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-10-18 15:25 -0700

#31689 — Re: len() on mutables vs. immutables

FromDemian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com>
Date2012-10-18 15:25 -0700
SubjectRe: len() on mutables vs. immutables
Message-ID<mailman.2478.1350599115.27098.python-list@python.org>
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Daniel Urban <urban.dani@gmail.com> wrote:
> The source is usually in Objects/*object.c (e.g., the source for list
> is in Objects/listobject.c, dict is in dictobject.c and so on). The
> implementation of __len__ is usually in a method called
> whatever_length (e.g., dict.__len__ is called dict_length). To be
> sure, you can check the PyTypeObject declaration for the type.
> Probably the tp_as_sequence or tp_as_mapping field contains the
> pointer to __len__ (sq_length or mp_length respectively). (You can
> also search for "lenfunc", which is the type of such functions.)

Many thanks for the details.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web