Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #31689 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-10-18 15:25 -0700 |
| Last post | 2012-10-18 15:25 -0700 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: len() on mutables vs. immutables Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-10-18 15:25 -0700
| From | Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-10-18 15:25 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: len() on mutables vs. immutables |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2478.1350599115.27098.python-list@python.org> |
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Daniel Urban <urban.dani@gmail.com> wrote: > The source is usually in Objects/*object.c (e.g., the source for list > is in Objects/listobject.c, dict is in dictobject.c and so on). The > implementation of __len__ is usually in a method called > whatever_length (e.g., dict.__len__ is called dict_length). To be > sure, you can check the PyTypeObject declaration for the type. > Probably the tp_as_sequence or tp_as_mapping field contains the > pointer to __len__ (sq_length or mp_length respectively). (You can > also search for "lenfunc", which is the type of such functions.) Many thanks for the details.
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web