Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #59211 > unrolled thread

Highest performance [benchmarked] "HTTP microframework"?

Started byAlec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com>
First post2013-11-13 02:53 +1100
Last post2013-11-13 02:53 +1100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python


Contents

  Highest performance [benchmarked] "HTTP microframework"? Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com> - 2013-11-13 02:53 +1100

#59211 — Highest performance [benchmarked] "HTTP microframework"?

FromAlec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com>
Date2013-11-13 02:53 +1100
SubjectHighest performance [benchmarked] "HTTP microframework"?
Message-ID<mailman.2473.1384271599.18130.python-list@python.org>
E.g.: using Cython

I am currently using Bottle, and it's fine; but provides much more than I need.

Investigating rewriting in C++; perhaps using restcgi. Can give that
restcgi a bit of a rewrite, removing the boost dependency and
replacing it with a C++11 dependency.

However given the lack of a "neat" ORM in C++ with a large variety of
backends (like SQLalchemy has); I would be leveraging boost::Python or
similar.

So maybe I should give Python another chance? - What's the highest
performance Python "HTTP microframework" capable of routing with
decorators?

Thanks for all suggestions,

Alec Taylor

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web