Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #59211 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-11-13 02:53 +1100 |
| Last post | 2013-11-13 02:53 +1100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
Highest performance [benchmarked] "HTTP microframework"? Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com> - 2013-11-13 02:53 +1100
| From | Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-13 02:53 +1100 |
| Subject | Highest performance [benchmarked] "HTTP microframework"? |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2473.1384271599.18130.python-list@python.org> |
E.g.: using Cython I am currently using Bottle, and it's fine; but provides much more than I need. Investigating rewriting in C++; perhaps using restcgi. Can give that restcgi a bit of a rewrite, removing the boost dependency and replacing it with a C++11 dependency. However given the lack of a "neat" ORM in C++ with a large variety of backends (like SQLalchemy has); I would be leveraging boost::Python or similar. So maybe I should give Python another chance? - What's the highest performance Python "HTTP microframework" capable of routing with decorators? Thanks for all suggestions, Alec Taylor
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web