Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #31681 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-10-18 13:38 -0600 |
| Last post | 2012-10-18 13:38 -0600 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: len() on mutables vs. immutables Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-18 13:38 -0600
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-10-18 13:38 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: len() on mutables vs. immutables |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2471.1350589145.27098.python-list@python.org> |
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Prasad, Ramit <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> wrote: > Why does pointer arithmetic work for dicts? I would think the position > of a value would be based on the hash of the key and thus "random" for > the context of this conversation. It doesn't. len() on CPython dicts is O(1) because the dict keeps track of how many items it contains. It needs to do this anyway so that it can determine when to grow the internal hash table.
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web