Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #46430 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-05-30 13:59 +1000 |
| Last post | 2013-05-30 13:59 +1000 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: How clean/elegant is Python's syntax? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-30 13:59 +1000
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-05-30 13:59 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: How clean/elegant is Python's syntax? |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2394.1369886352.3114.python-list@python.org> |
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm finding it kind of hard to imagine not finding Python's syntax and > semantics pretty graceful. > > About the only thing I don't like is: > > var = 1, > > That binds var to a tuple (singleton) value, instead of 1. I agree, and would write it as: var = (1,) for clarity. ChrisA
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web