Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #25759 > unrolled thread

Re: ANN: dbf.py 0.94

Started byChris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
First post2012-07-22 04:28 +1000
Last post2012-07-22 04:28 +1000
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: ANN: dbf.py 0.94 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-22 04:28 +1000

#25759 — Re: ANN: dbf.py 0.94

FromChris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Date2012-07-22 04:28 +1000
SubjectRe: ANN: dbf.py 0.94
Message-ID<mailman.2393.1342895319.4697.python-list@python.org>
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> wrote:
> I'll support 3.3+, but not with the same code base:  I want to use all the
> cool features that 3.3 has!  :)

The trouble with double-codebasing is that you have double
maintenance. But sure. So long as your time isn't under great
pressure, it can be quite effective.

Recommendation: Figure out a way to minimize double-handling of
things. One way might be to have source control manage it for you -
apply a patch to your 3.3+ source tree, then merge it into your 2.4+
tree and see if it applies cleanly. I dunno how successful that'd be,
but I really dread the idea of maintaining, unassisted, two identical
projects in two dialects of the same language. Recipe for burnout I'd
predict.

ChrisA

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web