Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #39729 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-02-23 21:51 -0500 |
| Last post | 2013-02-23 21:51 -0500 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Should Docstrings include RFC citations? - And are non PEP257 syntaxes frowned upon? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-02-23 21:51 -0500
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-23 21:51 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Should Docstrings include RFC citations? - And are non PEP257 syntaxes frowned upon? |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2392.1361674308.2939.python-list@python.org> |
On 2/23/2013 1:14 PM, Alec Taylor wrote: > PEP257 defines docstring syntax, It suggest a docstring format, which is not religiously followed even in the stdlib. It explicitly disclaims being 'the law'. Do what works for you. -- Terry Jan Reedy
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web