Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #6753 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-05-31 13:01 -0700 |
| Last post | 2011-05-31 13:01 -0700 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: scope of function parameters (take two) Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-05-31 13:01 -0700
| From | Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-05-31 13:01 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: scope of function parameters (take two) |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2332.1306871338.9059.python-list@python.org> |
Henry Olders wrote: > Clearly, making a copy within the function eliminates the possibility of > the side effects caused by passing in mutable objects. Would having the > compiler/interpreter do this automatically make python so much > different? It would be a different language. ~Ethan~
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web