Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #6698 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Daniel Kluev <dan.kluev@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-05-31 14:18 +1100 |
| Last post | 2011-05-31 14:18 +1100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: scope of function parameters (take two) Daniel Kluev <dan.kluev@gmail.com> - 2011-05-31 14:18 +1100
| From | Daniel Kluev <dan.kluev@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-05-31 14:18 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: scope of function parameters (take two) |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2292.1306811932.9059.python-list@python.org> |
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote: > Infinitely-nested scoping is simply one of the casualties of a > non-declarative language. Well, this is not accurate, as you can have 'infinitely-nested scoping' in python, in form of nested functions. For example, you can use map(lambda x: <expressions with x, including other map/filter/reduce/lambda's>, list_of_x), and you will have your isolated scopes. Although due to lambdas supporting only expressions, following this style leads to awkward and complicated code (and/or instead if, map instead for, and so on). -- With best regards, Daniel Kluev
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web