Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #25557 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-07-17 20:11 -0700 |
| Last post | 2012-07-17 20:11 -0700 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Foxpro goto command and deleted records Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2012-07-17 20:11 -0700
| From | Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-07-17 20:11 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Foxpro goto command and deleted records |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2263.1342582591.4697.python-list@python.org> |
MRAB wrote: > On 18/07/2012 03:19, Ethan Furman wrote: >> MRAB wrote: >>> On 17/07/2012 23:57, Ethan Furman wrote: >>>> In Foxpro if you do a >>>> >>>> GOTO 7 >>>> >>>> with deleted off and record 7 is deleted, the record pointer doesn't >>>> move (at least in version 6). >>>> >>>> I don't like that. >>>> >>>> I see four other options: >>>> >>>> 0) don't move the pointer (listed for completeness) >>>> 1) go to that record anyway >>>> 2) go to the next undeleted record >>>> 3) go to the seventh undeleted record (possibly the least practical) >>>> 4) raise an exception >>>> >>>> Any opinions? >>>> >>> What happens when you 'delete' a record? Does it disappear immediately, >>> or is it merely marked for deletion? >> >> Marked for deletion. >> >>> If it is marked for deletion, can it be unmarked? Will a marked record >>> be removed when the file is closed, or does the file need to be >>> explicitly purged/compacted? >> >> Yes, it can be unmarked. No, the table must be explicitly packed. >> >>> If it is merely marked, then I think the best option is 1, or possibly >>> 4 if the file is compacted when closed. >> >> There is a use_deleted setting that controls whether deleted records are >> accessed or skipped. Skipping is fine when looping, not so fine when >> going directly to a particular record. >> > If use_deleted is false, does that mean that deleted records are > hidden, or just that when iterating through the records the deleted > ones aren't yielded? Definitely the latter, but I'm starting to wonder if the former should also be the case. ~Ethan~
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web