Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #46172 > unrolled thread

Re: Short-circuit Logic

Started byCameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>
First post2013-05-27 16:13 +1000
Last post2013-05-27 16:13 +1000
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Short-circuit Logic Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2013-05-27 16:13 +1000

#46172 — Re: Short-circuit Logic

FromCameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>
Date2013-05-27 16:13 +1000
SubjectRe: Short-circuit Logic
Message-ID<mailman.2235.1369635220.3114.python-list@python.org>
On 27May2013 06:59, Vito De Tullio <vito.detullio@gmail.com> wrote:
| Cameron Simpson wrote:
| >   if s is not None and len(s) > 0:
| >     ... do something with the non-empty string `s` ...
| > 
| > In this example, None is a sentinel value for "no valid string" and
| > calling "len(s)" would raise an exception because None doesn't have
| > a length.
| 
| obviously in this case an `if s: ...` is more than sufficient :P

:P

My fault for picking too similar a test.

Cheers,
-- 
Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>

Death is life's way of telling you you've been fired.   - R. Geis

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web