Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #11261 > unrolled thread

Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ?

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ? przemolicc@poczta.fm - 2011-08-12 09:50 +0200

#11261 — Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ?

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 02:48:43PM +0100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:46 PM,  <przemolicc@poczta.fm> wrote:
> > This is the way I am going to use.
> > But what is the best data type to hold so many rows and then operate on them ?
> >
> 
> List of strings. [...]

Let's assume I have the whole list in the memory:
Can I use this list in the following way ?
subprocess_1 - run on list between 1 and 10000
subprocess_2 - run on list between 10001 and 20000
subprocess_3 - run on list between 20001 and 30000
etc
...
Can I use sort of indexing on this list ?


Regards
Przemyslaw Bak (przemol)



















































----------------------------------------------------------------
Doladuj telefon przez Internet!
Sprawdz >> http://linkint.pl/f2a06

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web