Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #11214 > unrolled thread

Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ?

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ? przemolicc@poczta.fm - 2011-08-11 15:46 +0200

#11214 — Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ?

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:59:31AM +0100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> 
> What may be the easiest way is to do the select in a single process,
> then partition it and use the Python multiprocessing module to split
> the job into several parts. Then you need only concatenate the handful
> of strings.

This is the way I am going to use.
But what is the best data type to hold so many rows and then operate on them ?

Regards
Przemyslaw Bak (przemol)



















































----------------------------------------------------------------
Zarabiasz 4 tys./miesiac? Damy wiecej!
Sprawdz >> http://linkint.pl/f2a0f

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web