Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #11208 > unrolled thread

Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ?

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ? Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2011-08-11 13:59 +0200

#11208 — Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ?

Chris Angelico, 11.08.2011 12:59:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 7:40 AM,<przemolicc@poczta.fm>  wrote:
>> I am not a database developer so I don't want to change the whole process
>> of data flow between applications in my company. Another process is
>> reading this XML from particular Oracle table so I have to put the final XML there.
>
> I think you may be looking at a submission to
> http://www.thedailywtf.com/ soon. You seem to be working in a rather
> weird dataflow. :( Under the circumstances, you're probably going to
> want to go with the original ''.join() option.
>
>> This server has 256 GB of RAM so memory is not a problem.
>> Also the select which fetches the data is sorted. That is why I have to
>> carefully divide into subtasks and then merge it in correct order.
>
> There's no guarantee that all of that 256GB is available to you, of course.
>
> What may be the easiest way is to do the select in a single process,
> then partition it and use the Python multiprocessing module to split
> the job into several parts. Then you need only concatenate the handful
> of strings.

Or join them using an n-way merge.

Stefan

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web