Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #91518 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-05-30 11:45 +0300 |
| Last post | 2015-05-30 11:45 +0300 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Minus operator versus unary minus Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2015-05-30 11:45 +0300
| From | Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-05-30 11:45 +0300 |
| Subject | Re: Minus operator versus unary minus |
| Message-ID | <mailman.217.1432975544.5151.python-list@python.org> |
On 30.05.15 10:56, Peter Otten wrote: > The following modification of the collections.Counter implementation > > https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/fe4efc0032b5 > > was just checked in with the line > > result[elem] = 0 - count > > Does this have an advantage over the obvious > > result[elem] = -count > > ? >>> x = 0.0 >>> -x -0.0 >>> 0 - x 0.0
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web