Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #11198 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Gelonida N <gelonida@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-08-11 11:29 +0200 |
| Last post | 2011-08-11 11:29 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: problem installing psyco on windows (Unable to find vcvarsall.bat) Gelonida N <gelonida@gmail.com> - 2011-08-11 11:29 +0200
| From | Gelonida N <gelonida@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-08-11 11:29 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: problem installing psyco on windows (Unable to find vcvarsall.bat) |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2166.1313055010.1164.python-list@python.org> |
On 08/11/2011 06:03 AM, Dan Stromberg wrote: Hi Dan, > FWIW, a few months ago I was working on a database application on > Windows, and I benchmarked the psyco-enhanced version consistently > running slower than the non-psyco version. The same code on Linux was > faster with psyco though. Good to know. I wanted to make the test myself though. There's one / two modules where I would expect an increase in performance. The rest of the application will rather definitely not benefit from psyco. Also one thing, that I wanted to try is to not use psyco for the application itself, but just for running py2exe a little faster. > > If you need performance, and you aren't constrained by module > availability, you probably should use PyPy instead. Well many module depenencies. :-( and also a lot of old legacy code, which will probably not survive PyPy (files not being closed explicitely for example)
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web